Audit GitHub VAPA proposal issues against framework quality checklists.
npx skills add https://github.com/insentek/VAPA --skill vapa-review
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: vapa-review Source: https://github.com/insentek/VAPA/tree/main/skills/vapa-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/insentek/VAPA --skill vapa-review
This skill solves the challenge of maintaining high-quality standards in AI-assisted development by providing an objective, framework-aligned audit of proposal issues without the risk of accidental modifications.
Run the vapa-review skill by providing the issue number or full URL to analyze the proposal against the VAPA framework.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To audit a GitHub proposal issue, provide the issue number or full URL to the skill, which fetches issue metadata and discussion threads via authenticated GitHub CLI to evaluate readiness against VAPA framework checklists.
A read-only code review for AI-assisted development proposals is a safety mechanism that strictly prohibits write operations, label changes, or comment postings, ensuring the agent acts purely as an advisor to validate task readiness without accidental modifications.
Yes, you need the GitHub CLI installed and authenticated, along with local repository context, because the VAPA proposal audit requires this access to fetch and evaluate issue metadata and discussion threads.
Yes, you can check proposal readiness before implementation by running the audit to identify missing acceptance criteria, technical gaps, and strategic misalignments in a proposal issue, ensuring only well-vetted tasks reach the execution phase.
The limitation of using a read-only agent for GitHub issue audits is that it strictly prohibits any write operations, meaning it cannot automatically apply label changes, post comments, or modify the issue to enforce remediation.
vapa-review works with GitHub-based VAPA proposal issues by fetching issue metadata and discussion threads, validating them against the framework's five review questions and quality checklist to assess alignment with project objectives.
dyoshikawaAnalyze GitHub issue threads to extract problem statements and proposed technical solutions.
getty104Automate triage of GitHub issues labeled 'cc-issue-created' using comment history and labels.
BoboeggDecompose strategic questions into parallel research threads and synthesize findings into analysis.
xlelibertyDispatch a subagent to review git diffs against production-readiness criteria.
