vc:predict

Analyze proposed changes with five personas and output a verdict.

Updated May 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cryborg1211/quant_trading_telegram_bot --skill vc-predict
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: vc:predict
Source: https://github.com/cryborg1211/quant_trading_telegram_bot/tree/main/.agents/skills/vc-predict
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cryborg1211/quant_trading_telegram_bot --skill vc-predict

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Five expert personas independently analyze proposed changes, then debate conflicts to produce a consensus verdict before a single line of code is written.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-persona pre-analysis: Five perspectives review the change independently to surface risks.
  • Structured debate protocol: Personas analyze, identify agreements, conflicts, and weigh tradeoffs.
  • Actionable verdicts: Output GO / CAUTION / STOP with recommendations to guide implementation.
  • Ideal use cases: Before major features, significant refactors, architecture decisions, or high-risk changes.

Quick Start

Invoke vc:predict with your proposal description to receive a multi-persona pre-analysis verdict.

Frequently Asked Questions about vc:predict

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate architecture risks before implementing a major refactor?

A multi-persona pre-analysis evaluates architecture risks by having five expert personas independently review proposed changes across security, performance, and UX. It surfaces conflicts and outputs a GO, CAUTION, or STOP verdict with actionable recommendations before implementation.

What is the best way to run a design review for high-risk software features?

A structured debate protocol enables design review for high-risk features by having five expert personas independently analyze proposals across architecture, security, performance, and UX. They identify agreements, weigh tradeoffs, and produce a consensus verdict to guide implementation.

Can I get a security and performance assessment before writing any code?

Yes, a multi-persona pre-analysis provides security and performance assessment before writing code. Five expert personas independently analyze your proposal to surface risks and deliver a consensus verdict with actionable recommendations.

When do I need a multi-persona pre-analysis for architecture decisions?

You need a multi-persona pre-analysis for architecture decisions involving major features, significant refactors, or high-risk changes. It surfaces design tradeoffs across multiple expert perspectives and delivers a structured consensus verdict before implementation begins.

Does multi-persona pre-analysis work for UX and design tradeoff evaluation?

Yes, multi-persona pre-analysis works for UX and design tradeoff evaluation by including a UX expert persona. This persona reviews proposed changes alongside architecture, security, and performance experts to identify conflicts and reach a consensus verdict.