skills.rest
withkynam
withkynamCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

vc-predict

Simulate five expert personas to produce a GO, CAUTION, or STOP verdict.

1.1k|223|Updated May 27, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#decision-making#design-review#risk-analysis#mult-persona#go-caution-stop
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit --skill vc-predict-withkynam
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: vc-predict
Source: https://github.com/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/tree/main/.claude/skills/vc-predict
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit --skill vc-predict-withkynam

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Five expert personas independently analyze a proposed change, debate conflicts, and produce a consensus verdict before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured cross-functional review: simulates five expert perspectives to surface design, security, performance, and UX concerns early.
  • Mode flexibility: supports Simple and Deep modes, with Deep mode incorporating historical context from prior work.
  • Actionable verdicts: outputs a GO / CAUTION / STOP verdict with risk summaries and mitigations.

Quick Start

Provide a clear feature proposal to trigger the five-persona debate and obtain a consensus verdict.

Frequently Asked Questions about vc-predict

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a multi-persona risk review for architecture changes?▼

A multi-persona risk review for architecture changes simulates five expert perspectives to independently analyze a proposal, debate conflicts, and produce a consensus verdict before implementation begins.

How do I get a GO or STOP decision before implementing a major feature?▼

To get a GO or STOP decision before implementation, provide a clear feature proposal to trigger the five-persona debate, which outputs a consensus verdict with risk summaries and mitigations.

Can I use cross-functional design reviews for high-risk software projects?▼

Yes, you can use cross-functional design reviews for high-risk software projects, as this approach surfaces design, security, performance, and UX concerns early by simulating expert perspectives.

Does the architecture risk analysis incorporate historical context from prior work?▼

Yes, architecture risk analysis incorporates historical context from prior work when using Deep mode, which provides a more comprehensive evaluation compared to the standard Simple mode.

What is the best way to surface security and UX concerns early in a design proposal?▼

The best way to surface security and UX concerns early in a design proposal is running a structured cross-functional review that simulates multiple expert personas to independently analyze the change.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
auxi-wardrobeauxi-wardrobe
1

ck:predict

Simulate a five-persona debate to identify risks in change proposals.

Official
Advanced
misfitdevmisfitdev
2

hold-my-beer

Generate a 9-section execution plan with rollback steps and a GO/NO-GO verdict.

Official
Advanced
felix-howardfelix-howard

ck:brainstorm

Analyze trade-offs and assess feasibility for technical decisions.

Community
Advanced
vasilievyakovvasilievyakov
17

directors

Coordinates five expert directors to evaluate a project and synthesize consensus and disagreements.

Community
Advanced