verification-before-completion

Run full verification commands and document exit codes before declaring completion.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/buer2233/my_openclaw --skill verification-before-completion-buer2233
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/buer2233/my_openclaw/tree/main/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/buer2233/my_openclaw --skill verification-before-completion-buer2233

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

In collaborative development, claiming completion without verification risks inaccuracies and erodes trust.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Run full verification before declaring success to ensure outcomes are genuine.
  • Document evidence (outputs, exit codes, and logs) to support claims.
  • Guardrails for workflows across commits, PRs, and agent results.

Quick Start

Run the designated verification command, review the full output, and only claim completion if the verification confirms success.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce verification commands before declaring a pull request complete?

To enforce verification before completion, you must run the full verification command, review its complete output, and document exit codes and failures to ensure success claims are evidence-based across commits and pull requests.

What is evidence-based completion in continuous integration workflows?

Evidence-based completion requires running full verification commands and documenting outputs, exit codes, and failures before stating success, preventing unverified claims and eroding trust in collaborative development environments.

Why does claiming completion without verification erode trust in collaborative development?

Claiming completion without verification risks inaccuracies because unverified success claims lack documented evidence like output logs and exit codes, which erodes trust among collaborators relying on genuine quality assurance.

How do I document verification outcomes for agent outputs and commits?

You document verification outcomes by running the designated verification command, capturing the complete results, and recording the specific outputs, exit codes, and any failures before stating that the agent outputs or commits are successful.

Does evidence-based verification work with existing CI guardrails for pull requests?

Yes, evidence-based verification applies across commits, pull requests, and agent outputs by requiring the full verification command to run and its complete results to be reviewed, serving as guardrails for existing workflows.