verification-before-completion

Run verification commands before claiming work completion.

1|Updated Jul 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dogekiki/SP-test --skill verification-before-completion-dogekiki
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/dogekiki/SP-test/tree/main/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dogekiki/SP-test --skill verification-before-completion-dogekiki

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill prevents the common pitfall of claiming work is finished or correct without actual proof, ensuring that all assertions of success are backed by verifiable evidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Verification Gatekeeping: Forces a strict protocol of identifying, running, and reading verification commands before any status claims are made.
  • Rationalization Prevention: Provides a framework to identify and stop common excuses for skipping verification, such as relying on assumptions or partial checks.
  • Use Case: Before committing code or creating a pull request, use this skill to systematically run tests, check linter output, and verify build status to ensure the work is truly ready.

Quick Start

Apply the verification before completion protocol to your current task by identifying the specific command that proves your work is finished and executing it before making any claims.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce evidence-based verification before claiming work completion?

Evidence-based verification requires a strict protocol of identifying, running, and reading verification command outputs before making any task completion claims. This prevents unverified assertions by forcing validation checks as a prerequisite gatekeeping step.

What is the best way to prevent rationalizing skipped checks during software development?

Preventing rationalization requires a framework that stops common excuses for skipping verification, such as relying on assumptions or partial checks. It enforces accountability by mandating strict adherence to running verification commands for every success assertion.

How do I systematically verify build status and linter output before a pull request?

To systematically verify build status before a pull request, identify the specific command that proves your work is finished, execute it, and read the output. This protocol ensures tests and linter checks are validated before proceeding.

Does this verification protocol apply to agent-based workflows and task management?

Yes, this verification protocol applies directly to agent-based workflows and task management. It enforces rigorous evidence-based validation for any system where accuracy and reliability are required before proceeding with completion claims.

Why should I run verification commands instead of relying on assumptions for quality assurance?

Running verification commands instead of relying on assumptions ensures all assertions of success are backed by verifiable evidence. This prevents the common pitfall of claiming work is finished without actual proof, maintaining strict quality assurance.