verification-before-completion

Require fresh verification evidence before claiming completion in software delivery workflows.

1|Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/droxey/skills --skill verification-before-completion-droxey
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/droxey/skills/tree/main/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/droxey/skills --skill verification-before-completion-droxey

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It prevents premature or dishonest claims of completion by forcing fresh verification evidence before you state that work is fixed, passing, or done.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-first completion policy: Enforces a hard rule that no “success/completion” language is allowed without running and checking the relevant verification command output.
  • Gate function workflow: Guides you to identify the proving command, run the full command, read complete output/exit status, and only then make a claim grounded in evidence.
  • Failure-mode and red-flag protection: Warns against common false-success patterns such as “should pass,” relying on partial checks, trusting other agents, or expressing satisfaction early.

Quick Start

Use this skill before committing, creating a PR, or declaring “done” by running the appropriate verification command and only reporting the result after reviewing the full output and exit code.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify code review and testing results before claiming completion?

Verification before completion requires running the full proving command, checking exit codes and failure counts, and only reporting success after reviewing the complete output evidence.

What is an evidence-first completion policy for release readiness?

An evidence-first completion policy forbids success-suggesting language without fresh verification evidence tied to a specific proving command. It enforces running full commands and checking exit codes before claiming done.

How do I prevent false-success claims during CI and linting validation?

Prevent false-success claims by avoiding common red flags like trusting partial checks or expressing satisfaction early. Run full verification commands, read complete output, and check exit status before reporting.

Does this verification workflow work for build validation and regression confirmation?

Yes, this verification workflow applies to software delivery workflows including build validation, regression confirmation, linting, and testing. It requires running the relevant proving command and checking exit codes before updating task status.

What are common red-flag patterns to avoid during PR status updates?

Common false-success red flags include claiming work "should pass," relying on partial checks, trusting other agents, or expressing satisfaction early without running the full verification command and reviewing its exit code.

When should I use a gate function workflow for software delivery?

Use a gate function workflow before committing, creating a PR, or declaring done. Identify the proving command, run the full command, read complete output and exit status, then make a claim grounded in that evidence.