verification-before-completion

Enforce evidence-driven verification before completion claims in code reviews.

Updated Jan 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/indiosmo/skills --skill verification-before-completion-indiosmo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/indiosmo/skills/tree/main/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/indiosmo/skills --skill verification-before-completion-indiosmo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonest and leads to unreliable outcomes. The core principle is to require fresh verification evidence before assertions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a structured verification workflow before any completion claims.
  • Guides users through a five-step gate to produce evidence-backed statuses.
  • Helps teams avoid false positives in tests, linting, builds, and reviews.

Quick Start

Run the verification command and review the full output before making any completion claim.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify code changes with evidence before claiming completion?

To verify code changes with evidence, execute tests, linting, and builds directly, then capture their full output. You evaluate these results to produce evidence-backed status updates, preventing unverified completion claims in software development.

What is evidence-driven verification in software QA?

Evidence-driven verification in software QA is a workflow requiring fresh execution outputs from tests, linting, and builds before making any completion assertions. It ensures claims are backed by verifiable evidence, avoiding false positives during code reviews.

When do I need to run build verification before a pull request?

You need to run build verification before a pull request whenever you intend to update task statuses or claim work is complete. This structured gate requires running verification commands and capturing outputs to prevent unverified claims.

What's the best way to prevent false positives in testing and linting?

The best way to prevent false positives in testing and linting is to enforce a structured verification workflow. This involves executing verification commands, reviewing the full output, and reporting claims only with verifiable evidence.

Does evidence-driven verification require any specific testing frameworks?

No, evidence-driven verification does not require specific testing frameworks. It applies to any software development context by enforcing a five-step gate to execute verification commands, capture outputs, and evaluate results for evidence-backed statuses.