verification-before-completion

Run verification commands and claim completion only with confirmed evidence.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/irismaker/ai-agent-skills-hub --skill verification-before-completion-irismaker
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/irismaker/ai-agent-skills-hub/tree/main/workflow/agents/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/irismaker/ai-agent-skills-hub --skill verification-before-completion-irismaker

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Before claiming work is complete, teams must verify results and present fresh evidence to support success. This skill codifies a gate to ensure honesty and repeatability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured verification flow: run a full verification command, capture output, and decide on completion only with evidence.
  • Auditable status: provides a repeatable checklist and output artifacts for reviews and approvals.
  • Use Case: ideal for CI workflows, code reviews, and release gating where verification is required before status changes.

Quick Start

Run the full verification command, review the output, and only claim completion if the evidence confirms success.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce verification before claiming task completion in a CI workflow?

You can enforce verification before completion by running a structured workflow that executes verification commands, captures the output, and only allows a completion claim after confirming successful test results and logs as evidence.

What is a verification gate in software development and when do I need one?

A verification gate is a formal checkpoint that requires fresh test results and artifacts before any status changes to complete. You need one for code reviews, task handoffs, and release gating to prevent unverified success claims.

How do I capture and audit test results as evidence for code reviews?

You capture and audit test results by running a full verification command that generates output artifacts. This provides a repeatable checklist and auditable status for reviewers to confirm that success claims are backed by fresh evidence.

Can I use a structured verification flow for release gating without external dependencies?

Yes, you can use a structured verification flow for release gating without external dependencies. It operates as a standalone workflow that runs commands, checks outputs, and gates completion based on confirmed evidence.

What is the best way to prevent unverified success claims during task handoffs?

The best way to prevent unverified success claims during task handoffs is to formalize a repeatable workflow that acts as a guardrail, ensuring teams present fresh logs and artifacts as evidence before any completion status is approved.

Why do I need fresh evidence to support completion claims in CI-CD pipelines?

You need fresh evidence in CI-CD pipelines to ensure honesty and repeatability. Relying on recently captured test results and output artifacts prevents unverified success claims and provides auditable proof for release gating.