verification-before-completion

Enforces fresh verification evidence before allowing completion claims in builds, tests, lints, or migrations.

291|38|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/J-Pster/Psters_AI_Workflow --skill verification-before-completion-j-pster
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/J-Pster/Psters_AI_Workflow/tree/main/plugins/psters-ai-workflow/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/J-Pster/Psters_AI_Workflow --skill verification-before-completion-j-pster

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Never claim completion without fresh verification evidence from commands run in the current execution context.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces evidence-backed completion claims at the end of workflows.
  • Documents and standardizes the evidence format (command, exit code, key output, conclusion).
  • Supports partial verification by explicitly stating limitations and listing next verification steps.

Quick Start

Run the designated verification command at the end of your workflow to attach fresh evidence before declaring completion.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce fresh evidence before claiming build or test completion?

To enforce fresh evidence before completion, run a designated verification command in the current execution context to capture the exit code and output. This ensures all final success claims are backed by freshly produced build, test, or lint evidence.

What is evidence-backed completion in software workflows?

Evidence-backed completion is a governance practice that requires running a verification command to produce fresh execution context output before declaring a task done. It standardizes evidence format by capturing the command, exit code, key output, and conclusion.

How do I document partial verification when full checks cannot run?

To document partial verification, explicitly state the limitations encountered during the verification command execution and list the next verification steps required. This clearly indicates that full evidence-backed completion was not achieved in the current run.

Can I use verification commands for migration workflows and lint checks?

Yes, you can run verification commands across build, test, lint, and migration workflows. The process executes the validating command completely, captures relevant output, and reports results with evidence regardless of the specific software project workflow.

What's the best way to standardize quality-assurance evidence format across projects?

The best way to standardize quality-assurance evidence is to require a structured format capturing the validating command, exit code, key output, and final conclusion. This governance approach ensures consistent evidence production for all completion claims.

Why does my completion claim fail without fresh verification output?

Completion claims fail without fresh verification output because the governance process requires evidence produced by a command run in the current execution context. Without capturing the exit code and relevant output, the success claim lacks the necessary validation evidence.