verification-before-completion

Run verification commands and confirm output before declaring task completion.

Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/KYRIE66nb/codex-omx-public-config --skill verification-before-completion-kyrie66nb
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/KYRIE66nb/codex-omx-public-config/tree/main/home/.codex/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/KYRIE66nb/codex-omx-public-config --skill verification-before-completion-kyrie66nb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Claiming work as complete without verification can be dishonest and waste time; this Skill enforces a mandatory verification step before any success claim, ensuring evidence-backed updates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a repeatable gate: identify the proving command, run it fully, read the output, and verify evidence before reporting success.
  • Reduces risk of false positives in PRs, releases, and status updates by requiring fresh verification results.
  • Provides a clear, policy-driven checklist that teams can apply to any completion claim to improve trust and accountability.

Quick Start

Identify the verification command for the task, run it fully, review the output, and only then claim success with evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce verification before reporting task completion?

To enforce verification before reporting task completion, identify a specific proving command, run it fully, parse the output, and confirm the evidence before asserting any success claim.

Why does claiming work as complete without verification cause problems?

Claiming work as complete without verification causes problems by creating false success claims that are dishonest and waste time, leading to false positives in PRs, releases, and status updates.

What is the best way to prevent false positives in PRs and releases?

The best way to prevent false positives in PRs and releases is to require fresh verification results by running a full verification command and confirming its output before declaring any task completion.

Can I use a policy-driven checklist to improve accountability in status updates?

Yes, you can apply a clear, policy-driven checklist to any completion claim to improve trust and accountability by ensuring evidence-backed updates during code reviews and QA handoffs.

Do I need to run a specific command to verify evidence before claiming success?

Yes, you need to identify the verification command for the task, run it fully, review the output, and only then claim success with evidence to ensure honest reporting.

When do I need to apply evidence-backed reporting for code reviews?

You need to apply evidence-backed reporting for code reviews, PRs, QA handoffs, and status updates whenever a task completion claim is made to ensure honesty and prevent false success claims.