verification-before-completion

Execute verification commands and report completion only with output evidence.

160|16|Updated Dec 4, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MaggieAppleton/maggieappleton.com-V3 --skill verification-before-completion-maggieappleton
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/MaggieAppleton/maggieappleton.com-V3/tree/main/.claude/skills/planning-and-product/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MaggieAppleton/maggieappleton.com-V3 --skill verification-before-completion-maggieappleton

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Claiming work as complete without verification introduces risk and misalignment. This Skill enforces the rule that all completion claims must be backed by fresh, verifiable results.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a repeatable verification workflow before status updates in PRs, deployments, and handoffs.
  • Guides users to identify the verification command, run it fully, and audit the output for failures.
  • Use Case: a developer cannot approve a PR until all tests pass and the verification outputs are reviewed and saved as evidence.

Quick Start

Run the full verification command, review the output, and only claim success with verifiable evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce verification checks before claiming a code deployment is complete?

To enforce verification before completion, you must identify the verification command, execute it fully, read its output and exit code, and only state the result with evidence. This prevents claiming work as complete without verification.

What does build verification require before approving a PR review?

Build verification for a PR review requires running the full verification command, auditing the output for failures, and saving the verifiable evidence. You cannot approve the PR until all tests pass and outputs are reviewed.

Why does claiming work is complete without evidence introduce risk?

Claiming work is complete without evidence introduces risk and misalignment because status certainty is not guaranteed. Enforcing a verification workflow requires fresh, verifiable results before any status updates in PRs, deployments, or handoffs.

Can I use process governance for documentation tasks or is it limited to code builds?

Process governance for verification applies to code, documentation, and project management tasks. Any task requiring status certainty, such as deployment checks or PR reviews, must execute the verification command fully and review the output before completion.

What is the best way to verify quality control results before a project handoff?

The best way to verify quality control before a handoff is to follow a repeatable verification workflow: identify the command, run it fully, audit the output for failures, and only claim success with fresh, verifiable evidence.