verification-before-completion

Run verification commands and record evidence before declaring task completion.

2|Updated Mar 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MomoDaviluke/star-citizen-promotion --skill verification-before-completion-momodaviluke
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/MomoDaviluke/star-citizen-promotion/tree/main/.trae/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MomoDaviluke/star-citizen-promotion --skill verification-before-completion-momodaviluke

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Declaring completion without verification leads to misinformation and quality risk. This Skill enforces a disciplined verification process before submissions or PRs, ensuring evidence-backed conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gatekeeping before completion: requires running predefined verification commands and validating outputs.
  • Evidence-driven reporting: attaches verifiable results to PRs or status updates.
  • Applicable to workflows: CI/CD, code reviews, and task closures.

Quick Start

Run the verification commands, review the full output, and only declare completion when all evidence confirms success.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce verification before a pull request is marked as complete?

To enforce verification before a pull request, you must run predefined verification commands and validate their outputs. Completion is only declared when concrete evidence from these test results confirms success.

What is evidence-backed verification in a CI/CD workflow?

Evidence-backed verification in a CI/CD workflow is the process of attaching concrete command outputs and test results to status updates. It ensures submissions are validated with actual proof rather than assumptions.

How do I stop task closures from happening without quality assurance validation?

To stop task closures without quality assurance validation, implement a gatekeeping process that requires running defined verification commands. Task completion is blocked until successful evidence is recorded.

Does evidence-driven reporting work with standard code review submissions?

Yes, evidence-driven reporting works with code review submissions by attaching verifiable command outputs to PRs. This ensures reviewers have concrete proof of validation before approving the closure.

Why declare task completion only after analyzing verification command outputs?

Declaring task completion only after analyzing verification command outputs prevents misinformation and quality risks. It guarantees that evidence-backed conclusions are reached before any submissions are finalized.

What's the best way to gatekeep code submissions using test evidence?

The best way to gatekeep code submissions using test evidence is to define a strict set of verification commands. Review the full output and only allow completion when all evidence confirms success.