verification-before-completion

Validate the completion of development tasks before declaring them done, using a five-step process for evidence-based reporting.

5|2|Updated Mar 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/oduffy-delphi/coordinator-claude --skill verification-before-completion-oduffy-delphi
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/oduffy-delphi/coordinator-claude/tree/main/plugins/coordinator/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/oduffy-delphi/coordinator-claude --skill verification-before-completion-oduffy-delphi

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Prevents dishonest completion claims by enforcing verification before reporting success.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a formal completion gate that requires an explicit verification step before asserting success.
  • Defines a repeatable 5-step procedure (IDENTIFY, RUN, READ, VERIFY, CLAIM) to ensure evidence supports any completion statement.
  • Applicable to development sprints, code reviews, PR closures, and any release workflow where evidence-based completion is required.

Quick Start

Run the verification command and attach the evidence before claiming success.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce evidence-based verification before a pull request closure?

Evidence-based verification before pull request closure requires running an explicit verification command and analyzing its output to ensure proof supports any success claim. This prevents premature completion claims by enforcing a formal completion gate.

What is the best way to prevent premature completion claims in development sprints?

Preventing premature completion claims involves applying a repeatable five-step procedure: IDENTIFY, RUN, READ, VERIFY, and CLAIM. This enforces an evidence-backed quality gate ensuring verification steps are run before reporting development success.

How does a formal completion gate work for code review tasks?

A formal completion gate works by requiring an explicit verification step to be executed and its output analyzed before success is asserted. It acts as a strict guardrail to ensure evidence is captured for all code review claims.

Do I need strict guardrails to verify claims with evidence?

Yes, strict guardrails are needed to verify claims with evidence because they enforce the formal completion gate. This ensures development tasks cannot assert success without first running verification commands and capturing the resulting output.

When do I need a quality gate that captures verification evidence?

You need a quality gate capturing verification evidence during development sprints, code reviews, PR closures, and release workflows. It is required whenever strict guardrails demand proof before reporting task success.