verification-before-completion

Run verification commands and inspect fresh outputs before completion claims.

6|Updated Mar 24, 2019
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rafifos/dotfiles --skill verification-before-completion-rafifos
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/rafifos/dotfiles/tree/main/dot_agents/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rafifos/dotfiles --skill verification-before-completion-rafifos

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill ensures verification is performed before declaring work complete, preventing claims without fresh evidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a structured verification workflow that requires running and validating final commands, outputs, and artifacts before making any success claims.
  • Provides a repeatable gate function that guides users to identify, run, read, verify, and only then claim results.

Quick Start

Run the verification sequence on the current task to prove completion before committing or opening a PR.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify task completion with fresh evidence before opening a pull request?

To verify completion before a pull request, run the full test suite and build commands, inspect the fresh logs and artifacts generated, and report those specific outputs as evidence that the task is complete.

Why do I need to run verification commands before claiming a release is ready?

Running verification commands before claiming a release is ready prevents false completion claims by enforcing a gate where you must execute tests, read the actual outputs, and validate artifacts before declaring success.

What is an evidence-based verification workflow for software development?

An evidence-based verification workflow requires identifying and executing explicit test commands, inspecting the resulting logs and artifacts, and only making completion claims after validating fresh outputs from those runs.

Does this verification process work for any software workflow needing test evidence?

Yes, this verification process applies to any software development workflow where completion claims require fresh evidence, enforcing explicit steps to execute commands, inspect results, and report findings before releases.

What's the best way to enforce explicit verification steps before committing code?

The best way to enforce explicit verification steps is applying a repeatable gate function that guides you to identify, run, read, and verify final commands and artifacts before making any success claims during your workflow.