verification-before-completion

Require fresh verification evidence before declaring task completion.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/RockwallJMC/piercedesk6 --skill verification-before-completion-rockwalljmc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/RockwallJMC/piercedesk6/tree/main/.claude/skills/VERIFY-BEFORE-COMPLETE
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RockwallJMC/piercedesk6 --skill verification-before-completion-rockwalljmc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Claims of completion or success without fresh verification undermine trust and quality. This Skill enforces a disciplined process to verify results before asserting completion.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforce fresh verification: Require running the full verification command and examining output before making any success claim.
  • Defined verification steps: Identify the proving command, execute it fully, read and interpret outputs, verify status with evidence, and only then declare completion.
  • Guardrails against false positives: Highlights common failures and red flags to prevent premature claims.

Quick Start

Run the full verification sequence in your project workspace and document the outputs before declaring completion.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent false completion claims in software QA workflows?

To prevent false completion claims, you must require fresh verification evidence before making any success statements. This involves identifying the proving command, running it fully, reading outputs, verifying status with documented evidence, and only then declaring completion.

What is the process to verify test results before closing a development task?

The verification process requires a five-step gate: IDENTIFY the proving command, RUN it fully, READ and interpret the outputs, VERIFY the status with documented evidence, and ONLY THEN declare the task complete. This stops premature success claims.

How do I document evidence for builds and linters before declaring success?

You document evidence by running the full verification sequence in your project workspace and recording the outputs. This enforces examining tests, linters, and builds to provide concrete proof before asserting any successful completion.

What are common red flags when verifying task completion in development?

Common red flags include making success claims without running the full verification command or failing to examine the output first. Guardrails against these false positives require interpreting actual outputs and verifying status with evidence before closing tasks.

Do I need any dependencies to enforce a verification gate for quality control?

No dependencies are required to enforce this verification gate. It operates independently within your software development and QA workflows to ensure teams run checks and document evidence before making any statements of success.