verification-before-completion

Enforce verification commands before allowing completion claims for tasks like code tests and builds.

1|Updated Feb 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/run6270/skill --skill verification-before-completion-run6270
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/run6270/skill/tree/main/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/run6270/skill --skill verification-before-completion-run6270

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill prevents the common and costly mistake of claiming a task is complete without proper verification, ensuring that claims are always backed by fresh evidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces Verification: Mandates running specific verification commands before any completion claim.
  • Prevents False Positives: Helps avoid reporting success based on outdated information or assumptions.
  • Use Case: Before declaring a bug fix complete, this Skill ensures the relevant test command is re-run and its output confirms the fix, preventing premature closure of tickets.

Quick Start

Always run the verification command before claiming any status.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent premature completion claims during code review?

To prevent premature completion claims, enforce a strict verification process that requires running specific testing commands and reviewing their output before any task is marked as done.

What is the best way to verify a bug fix before reporting success?

The best way to verify a bug fix is to re-run the relevant test command and explicitly review its output, preventing false positives based on outdated assumptions or previous states.

How do I enforce empirical evidence for quality assurance in software engineering?

You can enforce empirical evidence for quality assurance by mandating the execution of verification commands, ensuring that all completion claims are backed by fresh, empirical testing data.

Does process enforcement for task completion require running build processes?

Yes, process enforcement for task completion applies to scenarios requiring empirical evidence, such as running build processes and code testing, to validate success before finalizing tasks.

Why does claiming a task is complete without verification cause issues?

Claiming a task is complete without verification causes issues because it prevents false positives and avoids reporting success based on outdated information, which leads to costly mistakes and premature ticket closures.