verification-before-completion

Enforce verification before completion claims in software development workflows.

Updated Feb 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/theBulishMan/myproject-manager --skill verification-before-completion-thebulishman
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/theBulishMan/myproject-manager/tree/main/codex-skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/theBulishMan/myproject-manager --skill verification-before-completion-thebulishman

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enforces honest status reporting by requiring fresh verification evidence before declaring a task complete, preventing premature or unverified claims.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a structured 5-step verification flow (IDENTIFY, RUN, READ, VERIFY, ONLY THEN) before any completion claim.
  • Applies to software development workflows (CI, tests, lint, builds, PR reviews) to gate completion with demonstrable results.
  • Use Case: before merging a PR, run verification to confirm all checks pass and provide verifiable evidence of the outcome.

Quick Start

Run the verification command end-to-end and provide its fresh output as the basis for any completion claim.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent unverified success claims before declaring a software build complete?

To prevent unverified claims before declaring a software build complete, execute full verification commands like tests and lint checks, parse their outputs, and report evidence-backed results demonstrating success.

What is evidence-based verification in CI-CD workflows?

Evidence-based verification in CI-CD workflows is the process of running tests, builds, and lint checks end-to-end to gate completion claims with demonstrable, fresh output results rather than assumptions.

How do I enforce a structured verification flow before merging a PR?

To enforce verification before merging a PR, apply a structured flow by identifying required checks, running them, reading outputs, verifying results, and only then claiming completion with fresh evidence.

Does this verification approach work with lint checks and build processes?

Yes, this verification approach works with lint checks and builds by requiring you to execute these full commands end-to-end and provide their fresh output as the basis for any completion claim.

Why should I run verification commands end-to-end before claiming task completion?

You should run verification commands end-to-end before claiming task completion to enforce honest status reporting and prevent premature success statements that lack demonstrable, fresh evidence from tests or builds.

What are the limitations of claiming completion without fresh verification evidence?

Claiming completion without fresh verification evidence risks reporting unverified or premature success states, bypassing the required parsing of test, build, and lint outputs needed to gate PR reviews accurately.