verification-loop

Run build, type, lint, test, and security checks on code changes.

Updated Jul 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nazrulsoftwaredev/NIT_CRM_2 --skill verification-loop-nazrulsoftwaredev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-loop
Source: https://github.com/nazrulsoftwaredev/NIT_CRM_2/tree/main/.agents/.agents/skills/verification-loop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nazrulsoftwaredev/NIT_CRM_2 --skill verification-loop-nazrulsoftwaredev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the inconsistency and human error inherent in manual code verification by providing a standardized, multi-phase quality gate system for development sessions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Phase Validation: Executes automated checks for build status, type safety, linting, test coverage, and security vulnerabilities.
  • Diff Review: Provides a structured summary of code changes to ensure intent matches implementation.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a pull request, use this Skill to ensure your latest refactoring hasn't introduced type errors, broken tests, or exposed sensitive credentials.

Quick Start

Invoke the verification loop skill to perform a full quality check on the current project state.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-loop

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code quality checks before integrating changes?

Automating code quality checks requires a standardized verification loop that executes build, type, lint, test, and security analysis phases to ensure code integrity before integration.

What is the best way to run security scanning and linting on my current project?

The best way to run security scanning and linting is through a multi-phase validation system that automatically executes these checks and provides a structured diff review of your changes.

How does diff-based change review work for pull request submissions?

Diff-based change review provides a structured summary of code changes to verify that your implementation intent matches the actual modifications before pull request submission.

Can I run automated testing and type safety checks together in one workflow?

Yes, you can run automated testing and type safety checks together by invoking a comprehensive quality gate that validates build status, type safety, and test coverage in a single session.

What should I do if my code refactoring introduces type errors or broken tests?

If code refactoring introduces type errors or broken tests, perform a full quality verification to detect vulnerabilities and ensure your latest changes haven't compromised existing functionality.

When do I need automated quality gates for software development workflows?

You need automated quality gates for software development workflows requiring consistent code verification before integration or deployment, ensuring standardized checks replace manual error-prone reviews.