verify

Run required tests, linting, and builds to verify completion claims.

74|14|Updated Jan 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ActiveMemory/ctx --skill verify-activememory
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verify
Source: https://github.com/ActiveMemory/ctx/tree/main/.claude/skills/verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ActiveMemory/ctx --skill verify-activememory

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Verifying completion claims can be error-prone without standardized checks; this skill provides a structured approach to run verification commands and collect evidence before declaring success.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guidance on when to verify and when not to verify to avoid premature claims.
  • A repeatable workflow that runs fresh verifications (tests, lint, builds) and maps outputs to verifiable evidence.
  • Use cases include confirming feature completion, bug fixes, and refactor readiness in software projects.

Quick Start

Run the verify workflow to confirm completion before reporting results.

Frequently Asked Questions about verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify code changes before declaring a task complete?

To verify code changes before declaring completion, run fresh checks for tests, linting, and builds. This workflow collects output evidence matching predefined criteria, ensuring software development claims like feature completion or bug fixes are validated before reporting success.

What is the best way to automate build verification and lint checks?

Automating build verification and lint checks involves running explicit commands that interpret outputs and exit codes. This approach maps results to verifiable evidence, ensuring lints are clean and builds succeed before confirming a software refactor or feature is ready.

When do I need to run fresh verification checks in a software workflow?

You need to run fresh verification checks whenever confirming completion claims for features, bug fixes, or refactors. This structured approach prevents premature success reports by enforcing explicit commands to validate tests, linting, and builds before any results are confirmed.

Does this verification workflow require specific test or build tools?

This verification workflow does not require specific test or build tools, as it operates dependency-free. It enforces explicit commands to run fresh verifications, interpreting the outputs and exit codes of your existing tests, linters, and builds to collect matching evidence.

Why should I collect evidence before confirming a bug fix is complete?

Collecting evidence before confirming a bug fix prevents error-prone, unverified completion claims. By running fresh checks and mapping outputs to predefined criteria like passing tests and clean lints, you ensure the software changes are truly validated before reporting success.

What are the limitations of automating completion verification checks?

The limitation of automating completion verification is that it requires predefined criteria and explicit commands to function correctly. Without clear evidence matching rules for tests, linting, or builds, the workflow cannot accurately interpret outputs to confirm software readiness.