verify

Review code and text for compliance with project standards and accuracy.

76|6|Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gweslab/cerf --skill verify-gweslab
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verify
Source: https://github.com/gweslab/cerf/tree/main/.claude/skills/verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gweslab/cerf --skill verify-gweslab

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides an independent review mechanism for code, claims, and documents, helping to uncover critical issues that might have been overlooked by the primary agent.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Code Review: Automated review of code snippets or pull requests for common security vulnerabilities, logical errors, or non-compliance with project standards.
  • Claim Validation: Review of textual claims for factual accuracy and adherence to guidelines, useful for legal documentation or formal communication.
  • Document Verification: Ensures the integrity and validity of documents against project standards and reference materials.
  • Use Case: When writing critical sections of code, before releasing a significant document, or to verify the accuracy of a claim that is to be presented to stakeholders.

Quick Start

Run /verify your latest pull request.

Frequently Asked Questions about verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an independent code review to catch overlooked security vulnerabilities?

Independent code review is conducted by an automated hostile reviewer that checks snippets or pull requests for security vulnerabilities, logical errors, and project standard non-compliance. This unbiased process uncovers critical issues missed by the primary agent.

What is the best way to verify the factual accuracy of claims in formal documentation?

Claim validation is best performed by an independent reviewer that checks textual claims against project guidelines and reference materials. This ensures factual accuracy and adherence to standards, which is critical for legal documentation and stakeholder communication.

How do I ensure document integrity against project standards before release?

Document verification ensures integrity by automatically checking document validity against established project standards and reference materials. This process guarantees compliance before releasing significant documents to stakeholders.

Do I need specific project files to run an automated quality assurance check?

Yes, automated quality assurance requires access to CLAUDE.md and agent_docs. These files provide the necessary verification guidelines and project standards that the reviewer uses to evaluate code and claims.

How does a hostile reviewer improve quality assurance workflows?

A hostile reviewer improves quality assurance by providing an independent, unbiased review mechanism that actively challenges code and claims. This aggressive review approach helps uncover critical issues and logical errors overlooked during initial development.

Can I use automated claim verification for legal documentation workflows?

Yes, automated claim verification is applicable to content creation workflows, including legal documentation. It reviews textual claims for factual accuracy and adherence to formal guidelines, ensuring document integrity for formal communication.