verify

A verification plan identifies the exact behavior to prove for a change, leverages existing tests and builds to gather evidence, and outlines manual validation steps to prevent post-release surprises.

To verify changes without new tests, apply a verification workflow that gathers evidence from existing tests, builds, and type checks, documenting manual validation steps only if coverage is missing.

Gather evidence for software verification by running existing tests, builds, and type checks to prove the exact behavior, framing any failures clearly to validate the change before completion.

Manual validation steps are needed for quality assurance when existing test coverage is missing, allowing you to run the narrowest direct verification commands and document the results as evidence.

Yes, the verification workflow supports build and type check evidence reporting by applying validation across existing tests and builds to produce clear evidence and frame failures explicitly.

Framing failures explicitly in a verification plan matters because it provides clear evidence of unmet requirements, reducing wasted effort and post-release surprises by proving exact behavior before completion.