verify

Validate GitHub issue requirements, designs, and plans against the codebase.

3|Updated Nov 5, 2023
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Junroot/Nomat --skill verify-junroot
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verify
Source: https://github.com/Junroot/Nomat/tree/main/.claude/skills/verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Junroot/Nomat --skill verify-junroot

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

GitHub 이슈의 요구사항, 설계, 구현 계획을 코드베이스와 대조 검증하여 다음 단계로 넘어가도 되는지 확인하는 스킬입니다. 검증 결과는 이슈 코멘트로 기록하고 필요 시 요약을 사용자에게 제공합니다.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 이슈의 요구사항/설계/구현 계획을 코드베이스와 비교하여 모순, 누락, 실현 불가능한 항목을 식별합니다.
  • 요구사항과 설계가 실제 구현과 일치하는지 판단하고, 필요 시 수정 방향을 제안합니다.
  • 검증 결과를 이슈 코멘트로 남기고, 필요 시 요약 보고를 제공합니다.

Quick Start

선택한 이슈에 대해 요구사항, 설계, 구현 계획을 코드베이스와 대조하는 검증 흐름을 시작하고, 결과를 이슈 코멘트로 남긴 뒤 요약 보고를 제공합니다.

Frequently Asked Questions about verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate GitHub issue requirements against my codebase?

Validating GitHub issue requirements against a codebase involves checking the requirements, design, and implementation plans for contradictions, missing items, or impossible features before proceeding to the next stage.

When do I need to validate issue design before implementation?

Issue design validation is needed before implementation to ensure the proposed design matches the actual codebase, identify conflicts or dependencies, and confirm that acceptance criteria are verifiable.

How do I check for duplicate issues or dependency conflicts in a GitHub repository?

Checking for duplicate issues and dependency conflicts requires enforcing validation checks against the existing codebase and issue tracker, then proposing corrective actions if safety risks are detected.

Can I use automated issue triage to verify implementation plans for my codebase?

Automated issue triage can verify implementation plans by applying validation checks to issue tasks, recording the validation results as issue comments, and providing a summary of whether it is safe to proceed.

What is the best way to ensure GitHub acceptance criteria are verifiable?

The best way to ensure acceptance criteria are verifiable is to validate them against the codebase during the requirement stage, enforcing checks for conflicts and proposing corrective actions when necessary.

Why does my GitHub issue validation fail during the design stage?

Issue validation fails during the design stage when the proposed design contains contradictions, missing dependencies, or un-verifiable acceptance criteria compared to the actual codebase implementation.