verify-spec

Validate a specification against a planning document with PASS or FAIL results.

Updated Apr 7, 2026

Search Tags:#quality assurance #documentation #ai agents #requirements validation #spec review #planning documents #pass fail

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/voidreader/band-of-mercenaries --skill verify-spec-voidreader

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verify-spec
Source: https://github.com/voidreader/band-of-mercenaries/tree/main/.agents/skills/verify-spec
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/voidreader/band-of-mercenaries --skill verify-spec-voidreader

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

이 Skill은 기획 문서와 명세서가 서로 어긋나는 지점을 빠르게 찾아, 요구사항 누락, 모호한 표현, 수치 불일치, 시스템 연동 누락을 체계적으로 검증합니다.

Core Features & Use Cases

기획 의도 반영도, FR 명확성, 수치·공식 정확성, 시스템 상호작용 완결성, verifier 검증 가능성을 순서대로 점검합니다.
PASS 또는 FAIL 판정과 함께 이슈 목록과 수정 지시사항을 정리해 spec-writer가 바로 반영할 수 있게 합니다.
AI 주도 개발에서 문서 검토, 명세 재검증, 리뷰 루프, 회귀 위험 점검 같은 반복 작업에 적합합니다.

Quick Start

기획 문서와 명세서 경로를 함께 전달해 이 Skill이 두 문서를 비교하고 PASS 또는 FAIL 결과를 반환하게 하세요.

Frequently Asked Questions about verify-spec

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I validate that a spec matches the original planning document?▼

To validate that a spec matches a planning document, provide both document paths for comparison. The system checks intent reflection, requirement clarity, numeric consistency, system interactions, and verification readiness, returning a PASS or FAIL result.

What is requirements validation in AI-assisted spec review workflows?▼

Requirements validation is the process of checking a specification against a planning document for missing requirements, ambiguous expressions, numeric inconsistencies, and incomplete system interactions. It produces a PASS or FAIL judgment with a structured issue list and revision instructions.

How do I check numeric consistency and system interactions between two planning documents?▼

To check numeric consistency and system interactions, pass the planning and specification file paths to the validator. It systematically compares formulas, behavior rules, and system interaction completeness across both documents, flagging mismatches in an issue list.

Can I use automated spec review for feature requirements without any dependencies?▼

Yes, you can use automated spec review without external dependencies. The validator operates standalone, requiring only two document paths to compare feature requirements and behavior rules, generating PASS or FAIL results with concrete revision instructions.

What is the best way to get PASS or FAIL results for specification verification readiness?▼

The best way to get PASS or FAIL results for verification readiness is submitting both planning and spec paths to a validation workflow. It evaluates five checklist dimensions including verifier testability, then outputs a definitive judgment with actionable fixes.

Why does my specification FAIL validation against the planning document?▼

A specification FAILS validation when it contains missing requirements, ambiguous expressions, numeric inconsistencies, or incomplete system interactions. The review identifies these gaps across five checklist dimensions and provides concrete revision instructions for the spec writer.