verify

Verify claims against source code, documentation, git history, and external evidence.

Updated Feb 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/supertyrelle/pelley --skill verify-supertyrelle
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verify
Source: https://github.com/supertyrelle/pelley/tree/main/skills/verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/supertyrelle/pelley --skill verify-supertyrelle

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill checks claims against source code, documentation, git history, and external evidence so you can separate confirmed facts from speculation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-Based Validation: Confirms, refutes, or flags claims as uncertain using repository files, commit history, and web sources when needed.
  • Provenance-Aware Output: Attaches specific evidence references to each claim so downstream work can trust the result.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill when a teammate says a function exists, a change was made, or a documentation statement is accurate and you need a grounded answer.

Quick Start

Use the verify skill to check whether the claim that the repository supports idempotent installs is true and cite the evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I fact-check documentation claims against source code and git history?

Fact-checking documentation claims against source code and git history involves inspecting repository files and commit logs to classify assertions as verified, refuted, or uncertain. This process attaches specific evidence references to each claim for provenance-aware confidence scoring.

What is provenance-aware confidence scoring for codebase fact-checking?

Provenance-aware confidence scoring is a verification method that evaluates claims against repository files, commit history, and web sources. It classifies each claim as verified, refuted, or uncertain while attaching specific evidence references to ensure downstream work can trust the result.

How do I verify if a specific function exists in a repository using git history?

Verifying if a function exists in a repository using git history requires inspecting commit logs and source files to find evidence of the function's implementation. Claims are then classified as verified, refuted, or uncertain based on the discovered evidence.

Can I use external web lookup to verify research findings in a codebase?

External web lookup can verify research findings in a codebase by supplementing repository reads and history inspection. This optional capability allows the verification process to classify claims as verified, refuted, or uncertain using external evidence sources.

What is the best way to confirm a teammate's claim that a code change was made?

The best way to confirm a teammate's claim that a code change was made is to inspect git history and source code for evidence. This verification process classifies the claim as verified, refuted, or uncertain and attaches specific evidence references to the result.

When should I not rely on source code alone for claim verification?

You should not rely on source code alone for claim verification when documentation assertions or research findings require external validation. Optional web lookup supplements repository reads and git history inspection to classify claims as verified, refuted, or uncertain.