skills.rest
cursor
cursorOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

verify-this

Compare baseline and treatment artifacts to emit a verification verdict.

2.6k|204|Updated Jan 23, 2026
Search Tags:#evidence#baseline#verify#claims#reproducible#verdict#treatment
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cursor/plugins --skill verify-this
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verify-this
Source: https://github.com/cursor/plugins/tree/main/cursor-team-kit/skills/verify-this
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cursor/plugins --skill verify-this

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Verify a claim with fresh local evidence to determine truthfulness by restating it in falsifiable terms, capturing a baseline and a treatment, and comparing artifacts to decide between VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Falsifiable verification: restate a claim in measurable terms and compare baseline vs. treatment results.
  • Artifact-based verdicts: supports numerical data, logs, screenshots, and API traces to drive a clear decision.
  • Use Case: validate bug fixes or feature claims by providing before/after evidence and a repeatable workflow.

Quick Start

Provide a falsifiable claim, collect a baseline, collect a treatment, and compare artifacts to emit a verdict.

Frequently Asked Questions about verify-this

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify a bug fix claim with reproducible evidence?▼

To verify a bug fix claim, you restate it in falsifiable terms, capture a baseline before the fix, apply the treatment, and compare artifacts to return a VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE verdict.

What is falsifiable verification for software claims?▼

Falsifiable verification restates a software claim into measurable terms, capturing baseline and treatment results to compare artifacts like numerical data, logs, screenshots, or API traces for a clear decision.

How do I prove a performance improvement with before and after evidence?▼

You prove a performance improvement by collecting a baseline metric, applying the treatment change, and comparing the resulting numerical artifacts to determine if the original claim is VERIFIED.

Can I use API traces to verify before and after behavior?▼

Yes, you can use API traces as artifacts to verify before and after behavior by comparing baseline and treatment outputs, which drives a clear VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE decision.

What is the best way to validate UI changes reproducibly?▼

The best way to validate UI changes reproducibly is to capture baseline and treatment screenshots as artifacts, comparing them to emit a definitive verdict on the original falsifiable claim.

When would a claim verification return an INCONCLUSIVE result?▼

A claim verification returns INCONCLUSIVE when the captured baseline and treatment artifacts lack sufficient evidence or reproducibility to clearly determine whether the claim is VERIFIED or NOT VERIFIED.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
nthpaulnthpaul

verify-this

Compare baseline and treatment artifacts to verify falsifiable claims.

Community
Advanced
tale-projecttale-project
20

verify

Verify backend and frontend outcomes via Convex MCP and Playwright MCP.

Official
Advanced
xxihxxih
1

e2e-testing

Execute Playwright web app tests and generate HTML reports with CI/CD compatibility.

Community
Advanced
Leonardo-CorteLeonardo-Corte
1

maestro:user-testing-validator

Execute user-visible assertions from validation contracts and synthesize pass/fail results.

Community
Advanced