vibe-review

Automate design document, project plan, and pull request reviews with Codex AI.

1|Updated Jun 8, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ryosukesuto/dotfiles --skill vibe-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: vibe-review
Source: https://github.com/ryosukesuto/dotfiles/tree/main/config/claude/skills/vibe-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ryosukesuto/dotfiles --skill vibe-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the code and design review process by leveraging Codex to provide automated, structured feedback on design documents, plans, and pull requests.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Review: Submits design documents (design.md), plans (plans.md), or pull requests to Codex for review.
  • Prioritized Feedback: Classifies issues as Major (must fix) or Minor (optional fix) based on defined criteria.
  • Use Case: Before merging a pull request, submit it to the vibe-review skill to get an automated assessment of potential issues, ensuring higher code quality and design consistency.

Quick Start

Ask the vibe-review skill to review the design document.

Frequently Asked Questions about vibe-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a pull request using an AI assistant?

Automated code review submits pull requests to the Codex AI to assess potential issues and ensure code quality. Issues are categorized into Major and Minor based on defined criteria to guide human decisions before merging.

Can I use an AI assistant to review design documents and project plans?

Yes, design documents and project plans are submitted to the AI assistant for automated review. It identifies risks and provides structured feedback to facilitate informed progression through development phases.

How does automated design review categorize issues and guide iterative fixes?

Automated design review classifies issues as Major or Minor based on defined criteria. It guides iterative review cycles by highlighting human decision points and ensuring risk identification before progressing.

What is the best way to identify risks in a design document before merging?

Submitting design documents to the AI assistant identifies risks by categorizing feedback into Major and Minor issues. This ensures higher code quality and design consistency before merging a pull request.

Do I need to specify files explicitly for an AI code review or is it automatic?

The AI code review intelligently determines the review target automatically based on file presence, such as design.md or plans.md, but also accepts explicit arguments to specify the document or pull request.