vibe-review-docs

Flag conceptual errors and outdated instructions in project markdown documentation.

6|Updated Feb 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jacobcy/vibe-coding-control-center --skill vibe-review-docs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: vibe-review-docs
Source: https://github.com/jacobcy/vibe-coding-control-center/tree/main/skills/vibe-review-docs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jacobcy/vibe-coding-control-center --skill vibe-review-docs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured protocol to detect and correct conceptual errors, outdated instructions, and missing changelog or governance updates in project documentation, ensuring that documentation reflects the current V3 architecture and CLI surface.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Entry file audit: Review and validate CLAUDE.md, SOUL.md, STRUCTURE.md and other entry files for conceptual drift and incorrect terminology.
  • Docs and changelog inspection: Audit docs/, docs/prds/, and CHANGELOG.md for completeness, clarity, and alignment with code and workflows.
  • Guided reviewer output: Produce a prioritized report with required edits, clarity suggestions, and a handoff milestone to record review completion.
  • Use case: Running a documentation review for a docs-only PR or performing a periodic docs health check before release.

Quick Start

Review all changed markdown files in the current branch for conceptual inconsistencies, update suggestions, and missing changelog entries.

Frequently Asked Questions about vibe-review-docs

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit markdown documentation for conceptual drift and outdated instructions?

To audit markdown documentation, review entry files like CLAUDE.md and docs/ directories to identify conceptual errors, outdated instructions, and missing changelog updates. This process flags misalignments between project docs and current architecture.

What is a documentation review for a docs-only PR?

A documentation review for a docs-only PR evaluates changed markdown files for conceptual alignment and clarity rather than code correctness. It checks for outdated instructions and missing governance updates to ensure docs reflect current workflows.

How do I check if a changelog is missing required updates?

To check if a changelog is missing required updates, inspect CHANGELOG.md alongside repository diffs or PR file lists. This comparison reveals incomplete entries and highlights governance updates needed to align documentation with code changes.

Can I review project entry files like SOUL.md and STRUCTURE.md for terminology errors?

Yes, you can review project entry files like SOUL.md and STRUCTURE.md for terminology errors. The documentation audit validates these files against current architecture to identify conceptual drift and correct incorrect terminology.

Do I need repository diffs to perform a markdown documentation audit?

Yes, you need access to repository diffs or PR file lists to perform a markdown documentation audit. Parsing these diffs is required to compare markdown and CLI references against actual code changes and produce a prioritized review report.

What is the best way to generate a prioritized doc review report?

The best way to generate a prioritized doc review report is to parse markdown files and CLI references from changed branches, categorize findings into required edits and suggestions, and append a handoff milestone to record review completion.