vote-round

Coordinate multi-agent voting with challenger participation and structured decision outcomes.

15|4|Updated Mar 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/choam2426/geas --skill vote-round
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: vote-round
Source: https://github.com/choam2426/geas/tree/main/plugin/skills/vote-round
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/choam2426/geas --skill vote-round

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables parallel voting among multiple agents with challenger involvement to gather independent evaluations and trigger structured decisions when there is disagreement.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel voting with mandatory challenger participation to ensure robust scrutiny.
  • Vote artifacts captured per voter including vote, severity, rationale, concerns, and alternatives.
  • Structured decision outcomes such as approved_with_amendments or decision_triggered, with automated logging.

Quick Start

Provide a proposal path and select 2-4 voters including a challenger, then initiate a vote round to obtain a decision.

Frequently Asked Questions about vote-round

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate multi-agent voting to gather independent assessments for a proposal?

Coordinated multi-agent voting gathers independent assessments by spawning parallel voters, including a mandatory challenger, to capture votes, severities, and rationales, ultimately triggering structured decisions like approved_with_amendments.

What is structured decision-making with challenger involvement in AI agent workflows?

Structured decision-making with challenger involvement is a deterministic workflow where agents vote on proposals, ensuring robust scrutiny by mandating a challenger to surface concerns and alternatives before aggregating votes into a final decision outcome.

How do I set up a vote round for architecture or policy decisions?

To set up a vote round, provide a proposal path and select two to four voters, designating one as a challenger, then initiate the round to automatically aggregate votes, handle severities, and log the structured decision outcome.

Can I capture detailed rationales and concerns during parallel agent voting?

Yes, parallel agent voting captures detailed vote artifacts per voter, recording their individual vote, severity assessment, rationale, specific concerns, and suggested alternatives to ensure a comprehensive evaluation record.

What decision outcomes are supported when agents disagree on a design proposal?

When agents disagree on a design proposal, the workflow supports structured outcomes such as approved_with_amendments or decision_triggered, automatically logging the results along with the aggregated voter rationales.

Does multi-agent voting require a specific number of voters to trigger a decision?

Multi-agent voting requires selecting two to four voters for a valid round, including a mandatory challenger, to ensure independent evaluations are gathered before a structured decision is triggered and logged.