What problem does it solve?
Dense scalar series, plots, and large comparison tables from ML experiments overwhelm GitHub issues and logbooks, making results hard to review and reproduce. This Skill defines when and how to publish experiment data to Weights & Biases while keeping GitHub as the narrative layer.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Project Scoping Policy: Chooses the correct W&B project based on the type of work, defaulting to the
marin project for pretraining runs and requiring shared projects for run-to-run comparisons.
- Run Naming and Metadata Conventions: Aligns W&B run names with experiment IDs used in logbooks and issue comments, and groups related sweeps under stable group names.
- Reporting and Verification Checklist: Links W&B runs and reports from coordinating issues, verifies row counts and aggregation logic before publishing claims, and keeps artifacts under 10MB.
- Use Case: After finishing a pretraining sweep, publish the runs to the
marin W&B project, link the comparison chart from the tracking issue, and summarize only the decision-relevant numbers in GitHub.
Quick Start
Publish my latest pretraining sweep runs to the marin W&B project and link the comparison report from the tracking issue.