wangyangming-perspective

Diagnose know-do gaps and moral dilemmas using Wang Yangming's conscience framework.

1|Updated Apr 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ChenyqThu/wentian --skill wangyangming-perspective
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: wangyangming-perspective
Source: https://github.com/ChenyqThu/wentian/tree/main/experts/wangyangming
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ChenyqThu/wentian --skill wangyangming-perspective

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Provides a clear, practice-oriented lens to diagnose know–do gaps, moral dilemmas, and decision paralysis by applying Wang Yangming's "致良知" (reach good conscience) framework so users can move from conflicted awareness to concrete action.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Diagnose know–do gaps: Identify whether a user's hesitation comes from genuine uncertainty or from private desires and fears that obscure true judgment.
  • Moral and leadership guidance: Offer stepwise, heart-led action plans for ethical dilemmas, team conflicts, and high-stakes decisions with historical examples (e.g., Dragon Field insight, Ningwang campaign) as illustrative analogies.
  • Practice-focused coaching: Use targeted reflective questions, minimal viable action suggestions, and daily self-inspection prompts to convert insight into behavior.
  • Use cases: deciding whether to confront a partner, resolving a values-versus-profit dilemma, coaching leaders through crisis decisions, and turning theoretical knowledge into tested practices.

Quick Start

Use Wang Yangming's perspective to evaluate whether my hesitation to confront a cofounder stems from fear or a genuine moral conflict and propose the smallest actionable next step.

Frequently Asked Questions about wangyangming-perspective

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I resolve moral dilemmas and decision paralysis using philosophical frameworks?

To resolve moral dilemmas and decision paralysis, this framework uses Wang Yangming's cognitive lens to diagnose know-do gaps, map private motives against good-conscience signals, and produce concise, heart-led action steps for value conflicts.

What is the best way to diagnose a know-do gap when hesitation stems from fear or uncertainty?

Diagnosing a know-do gap involves asking targeted reflective questions to identify whether hesitation stems from genuine moral uncertainty or private desires and fears obscuring true judgment, followed by mapping user motives versus good-conscience signals.

How do I apply Wang Yangming's reach good conscience framework to leadership dilemmas?

Applying Wang Yangming's reach good conscience framework to leadership dilemmas provides stepwise, heart-led action plans and uses historical examples like the Dragon Field insight as illustrative analogies to guide high-stakes decisions and team conflicts.

Can I turn theoretical ethical knowledge into tested daily practice?

You can turn theoretical knowledge into tested practice through practice-focused coaching that uses minimal viable action suggestions and daily self-inspection prompts to convert introspective insights into concrete behaviors.

Does practical philosophy coaching work for resolving personal ethics and value-versus-profit conflicts?

Practical philosophy coaching works for personal ethics and value-versus-profit conflicts by applying a practice-oriented lens that clarifies value conflicts, evaluates decision motives, and prescribes actionable next steps referencing historical precedents.

When should I not use a perspective-driven cognitive framework for ethical decision coaching?

You should not use perspective-driven cognitive coaching when a dilemma requires strict legal compliance, quantitative risk modeling, or external arbitration rather than guided introspection and heart-led action prescriptions.