wbs-review-assistant

To check WBS Excel traceability, the review identifies requirement IDs lacking mapped WBS tasks and flags them as critical gaps. It evaluates your Excel file against project requirements to ensure complete traceability before baseline approval.

WBS gap analysis detects structural inconsistencies by validating hierarchy and numbering patterns within your Excel file. It identifies skipped WBS levels and unmapped requirements to highlight missing work before baseline approval.

Yes, you can cross-check hearing notes against WBS task names to highlight missing updates. The review compares hearing decision text with task descriptions to identify overlooked action items and generate evidence-backed findings.

To annotate Excel WBS files for quality review, the process applies non-destructive cell comments and conditional formatting. This severity color highlighting marks leaf tasks missing effort estimates directly within the original spreadsheet.

WBS quality review works with YAML checklists and PDF requirements to validate project scope. It uses PyPDF2 and docx dependencies alongside pandas and openpyxl to parse documents and identify mapping gaps.

The best way to generate Markdown gap reports from WBS Excel is to run an automated review that exports prioritized summaries and JSON gap analysis. This produces evidence-backed outputs for downstream baseline approval.