web3-triage-report

To write an Immunefi bug bounty report, use a template-driven structure that includes root-cause identification, impact quantification, comparison evidence, and proof of concept guidance. A 7-question triage gate helps validate the smart contract vulnerability before submission.

The best way to triage smart contract security findings is applying a standard 7-question validation gate. This process evaluates the suspected bug's root cause, quantifies its impact against payout tiers, and ensures the finding aligns with the bug bounty program scope.

To determine the correct severity for an Immunefi vulnerability submission, evaluate the finding against Immunefi's payout tiers and program scope. The triage process provides impact and severity guidance to align your smart contract bug report with the correct reward category.

Yes, you can use a structured triage process for internal audit findings, real-world bug submissions, and case studies. The 7-question validation gate and template-driven reporting format apply to any smart contract vulnerability analysis requiring standardized evaluation and documentation.

A 7-question triage gate improves vulnerability report writing by ensuring issues are evaluated in a standard, repeatable sequence. This structured approach guides you from initial validation through a complete report, reducing wasted time and increasing report quality.

A compliant Immunefi smart contract vulnerability report requires root-cause identification, impact quantification, comparison evidence, and proof of concept guidance. Reviewing 20 paid bounty case studies illustrates the common evidence patterns and writing style needed for successful submissions.