wf-docker-independent-critique-method

Automate independent no-context critique gates for high-risk tactical TODOs.

Updated Nov 7, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/belluga/delphi-ai --skill wf-docker-independent-critique-method
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: wf-docker-independent-critique-method
Source: https://github.com/belluga/delphi-ai/tree/main/.cline/skills/wf-docker-independent-critique-method
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/belluga/delphi-ai --skill wf-docker-independent-critique-method

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a governed mechanism to run an independent, no-context critique for high-complexity or high-impact tactical TODOs, ensuring the main thread context is not polluted and reviewer focus remains on the critique.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Isolated critique gate to prevent contamination of the main execution context.
  • Bounded-input discipline using bounded-file-set or bounded-summary packaging for critique requests.
  • Automated dispatch for subagents and auditable results with explicit resolutions.
  • Use Case: When a cross-module change presents high risk, invoke this critique to surface risks before approval.

Quick Start

Submit the high-risk tactical TODO and relevant planning artifacts to the critique gate to obtain an independent no-context assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about wf-docker-independent-critique-method

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate an independent risk assessment for high-impact tactical TODOs?

An independent no-context critique isolates the review process to prevent main thread context contamination, ensuring reviewer focus remains strictly on evaluating the high-impact tactical TODO and its bounded inputs to surface cross-module risks.

How do I isolate critique contexts for cross-module changes?

You isolate critique contexts for cross-module changes by applying a bounded-input discipline, packaging relevant planning artifacts into a bounded-file-set or bounded-summary to dispatch subagents for auditable, independent assessments.

When do I need a no-context critique gate for runtime-sensitive decisions?

You need a no-context critique gate for runtime-sensitive decisions when tactical TODOs are tagged as high-risk, ensuring an independent assessment surfaces material risks before approval without polluting the main execution context.

Does the independent critique process require bounded inputs?

Yes, the independent critique process requires bounded inputs by enforcing bounded-file-set or bounded-summary packaging for critique requests, which constrains the review scope and maintains auditable results with explicit resolutions.

What are the limitations of using an isolated no-context critique for code review?

The limitation of an isolated no-context critique is that it requires bounded inputs and cannot access the main execution thread context, meaning you must manually package all relevant planning artifacts to avoid missing cross-module dependencies.

What is the best way to review high-risk tactical TODOs without polluting execution context?

The best way to review high-risk tactical TODOs without polluting execution context is dispatching subagents through an automated critique gate that processes bounded inputs and returns auditable results with explicit resolutions.