What problem does it solve? Code review quality depends heavily on who reviews and how they are briefed: self-review misses the author's own blind spots, and a bare "review this" prompt yields shallow passes. This Skill provides a structured, adversarial review checklist that classifies findings by kind and urgency so nothing actionable is silently dropped. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured diff walkthrough: Checks correctness, edge cases, error handling, project constraints, tests (including a manual branch-coverage audit), conventions, and documentation hygiene. - Two-axis finding classification: Every finding is labeled defect vs. judgment and blocking vs. track-for-later vs. non-issue, each with a file:line reference and a disposition (pin with a test, record a decision, or decline). - Verdict output: Produces approve, request-changes, or questions with a standardized Markdown report format. - Use Case: Before merging a feature branch, dispatch a fresh agent with this Skill and an adversarial brief listing the change's load-bearing claims; the reviewer verifies each claim by measurement and returns blocking findings with locations. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review the current branch diff against the stated goal using the wf-review-code checklist and return a verdict with classified findings.
