What Next Colleague

To decide your next research direction when stuck, engage in a structured, multi-turn conversation that asks high-leverage questions and offers concrete options to resolve your bottleneck. The guided loop captures progress with periodic summaries until a clear next action is defined.

Iterative questioning for selecting a next action is a guided loop protocol that asks one high-leverage question per turn and provides 2-4 concrete options. It uses back-and-forth reasoning to resolve objectives, constraints, and success criteria for your research.

You guide a structured conversation to plan experiments by enforcing a questioning loop that clarifies your objective and environment. The process provides an explicit open-ended path and periodic context summaries until success criteria are resolved for a deterministic handoff.

Yes, you can use guided questioning to hand off a hypothesis to an experiment planner. The conversation resolves your objective, constraints, and success criteria, then performs deterministic handoffs to specialized roles like Hypothesis Designer or Experiment Planner.

The best way to resolve research bottlenecks before planning experiments is through a structured conversation that narrows down your next action. It enforces a protocol of offering concrete options and an open-ended path until your objective, environment, and constraints are fully resolved.

Yes, this guided conversation approach works for multi-turn research planning by maintaining alignment through context-capturing summaries after each turn. It traces decisions and records progress until the objective, constraints, environment, and success criteria are completely resolved.