wiki-audit

Process human feedback entries and apply corrections to wiki pages.

5|1|Updated Apr 15, 2026

Search Tags:#quality assurance #markdown #content review #audit #knowledge base #wiki #change management

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/GYF0311/lorekit --skill wiki-audit-gyf0311

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: wiki-audit
Source: https://github.com/GYF0311/lorekit/tree/main/skills/wiki-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GYF0311/lorekit --skill wiki-audit-gyf0311

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps you process human feedback on your wiki, ensuring reported issues are corrected and the knowledge base stays consistent and up to date.

Core Features & Use Cases

Feedback-to-page repair: Reads a pending feedback entry and edits the referenced wiki target (facts, timelines, or structure).
Accountability & archiving: Updates the target’s updated field, moves the feedback to resolved, and records a clear resolution section.
Quality check loop: Runs a quick lint/self-check after modifications to reduce accidental breakage.

Quick Start

Ask your AI to process the pending wiki feedback by running the audit workflow and applying the needed edits to each referenced page.

Frequently Asked Questions about wiki-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I process user feedback to correct inaccuracies in my wiki?▼

To process wiki feedback, the skill reads pending entries, edits the referenced target pages to fix facts or timelines, updates the modified date, and archives the resolved feedback.

What is the best way to audit and maintain a markdown knowledge base?▼

Auditing a markdown knowledge base involves listing open feedback items, reconciling structural filing issues in-place, and running a quick lint pass to ensure content consistency.

How do I apply change management to wiki content without breaking existing structures?▼

Applying change management to wiki content requires reading feedback and target frontmatter, modifying the compiled truth or filing rules, and running a self-check to prevent accidental breakage.

Can I automatically update content review feedback and archive it in my knowledge base?▼

Yes, content review feedback can be processed by applying corrections to target pages, refreshing the updated date, moving the entry to resolved, and recording a clear resolution section.

What are the limitations of relying on user feedback for wiki quality assurance?▼

Quality assurance via user feedback requires manually reported inaccuracies and missing timelines, meaning unreported issues remain unresolved until explicitly flagged in the audit workflow.

Does wiki-audit work with markdown files that use custom frontmatter fields?▼

Yes, the workflow reads target frontmatter and updates specific fields like the compiled truth, timeline, filing rules, and the updated date to keep markdown files accurate.