wikipedia-notability-assessment

You can assess Wikipedia notability by evaluating a subject against the General Notability Guideline and Subject-Specific Notability Guidelines. This framework automates checks for source quality, reliability, and independence to generate a structured report with recommendations.

The General Notability Guideline (GNG) requires a subject to have received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Source evaluation involves checking these references to ensure they meet Wikipedia's standards for reliability, independence, and significance before creating an article.

You can check if sources meet Wikipedia notability requirements by evaluating their reliability, independence, and significance. The automated assessment framework analyzes source quality and generates a detailed structured report with clear recommendations for your notability decision.

Yes, you can use this framework for subject-specific guidelines beyond GNG. It implements automated checks for 13 Subject-Specific Notability Guidelines alongside the General Notability Guideline to provide a comprehensive evaluation tailored to your specific subject.

Yes, you must provide source details including the source title, type, and indicators of reliability, independence, and significance. This input allows the framework to evaluate source quality against notability guidelines and generate a structured report with clear recommendations.

The best way to automate Wikipedia notability checks is to use a framework that evaluates source quality programmatically. This approach uses Python libraries for text processing and data analysis to assess sources against GNG and SNG criteria, outputting structured reports with recommendations.