wise-agent-harness-architecture

To align Wise product architecture with agent harness workflow boundaries, evaluate proposed features against established rules for UI domain separation, runtime semantics, and configuration surfaces. This prevents architectural drift when evolving product surfaces like Cockpit, Chat, and Inspector.

Organizing ViewMode changes and workspace semantics in Wise requires applying architecture consistency checks. These checks evaluate relationships between Mission, Trellis, and configuration-center organization to maintain coherent runtime semantics across product surfaces.

You need product surface classification for Wise feature design when adding features that affect navigation, PRD workflows, agent orchestration, or runtime configuration. It guides decisions across Operator, Author, and Inspector domains to align with the development cockpit model.

Yes, you can use Wise architecture rules to evaluate PRD flows and Mission relationships. The rules help assess whether proposed features fit the established product architecture by checking runtime semantics and UI domain separation across Trellis and Workspace configurations.

Architectural drift occurs when evolving Wise product surfaces due to unstructured changes across navigation, ViewMode, and configuration boundaries. Applying agent harness concepts and workflow boundaries prevents this by enforcing coherent runtime semantics and product-level architectural consistency.

The primary limitation is that agent harness concepts strictly enforce UI domain separation between Operator, Author, and Inspector domains. Features spanning multiple configuration surfaces may require careful evaluation to maintain coherent runtime semantics and avoid violating workflow boundaries.