work-on-issue

Orchestrate software issue lifecycles from claim to merged PR via GitHub.

4|Updated Feb 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mkalkere/agent-coordinator --skill work-on-issue-mkalkere
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: work-on-issue
Source: https://github.com/mkalkere/agent-coordinator/tree/main/.os/skills/development/work-on-issue
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mkalkere/agent-coordinator --skill work-on-issue-mkalkere

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Orchestrates the end-to-end lifecycle of software issues, from initial claim to final handoff, ensuring disciplined workflows and traceable outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-end lifecycle orchestration: claim, branch, implement, commit, PR, review, and handoff with memory of learnings.
  • Cross-tool coordination: integrates Git, GitHub PRs, and a coordinator bus to keep downstream agents aligned.
  • Guardrails and compliance: enforces phase gates, branch naming, test requirements, and PR workflows to ensure code quality and auditability.

Quick Start

Claim the existing task, branch from main, implement the work, open a PR, and pass ownership to a reviewer through the coordinated lifecycle.

Frequently Asked Questions about work-on-issue

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate the end-to-end GitHub issue lifecycle from claim to merged PR?

Automating the end-to-end GitHub issue lifecycle requires orchestrating claim, branch creation, implementation, testing, PR creation, review, and handoff. This Skill coordinates Git and GitHub PRs while enforcing phase gates, conventional commits, and branch naming for traceable delivery.

What is the best way to enforce conventional commits and branch naming in automated workflows?

Enforcing conventional commits and branch naming in automated workflows is achieved by applying phase gates during issue orchestration. The process coordinates Git operations and PR workflows to ensure code quality, compliance, and auditability across the software engineering lifecycle.

How do I coordinate downstream agents during a GitHub PR review and handoff?

Coordinating downstream agents during PR review and handoff is managed through a coordinator bus. This integration keeps cross-tool workflows aligned by passing ownership through the coordinated lifecycle and triggering downstream notifications for traceable outcomes.

Can I use Git and GitHub PR workflows for automated issue tracking without losing traceability?

Yes, Git and GitHub PR workflows support automated issue tracking without losing traceability by enforcing test requirements and phase gates. Orchestrating the lifecycle from claim to handoff ensures disciplined workflows, cross-tool coordination, and auditable delivery outcomes.

Does issue lifecycle orchestration work for software engineering scenarios spanning multiple phase gates?

Issue lifecycle orchestration works for software engineering scenarios spanning multiple phase gates by coordinating claim, implementation, testing, and handoff. It enforces test requirements and PR workflows to ensure code quality and auditability across the entire delivery process.

When should I not use automated issue orchestration for Git branch creation and PR workflows?

Automated issue orchestration for Git branch creation and PR workflows may not suit projects lacking strict compliance or phase gate requirements. If your software engineering workflow does not need enforced conventional commits, test requirements, or cross-tool coordination, manual tracking might suffice.