work-unit-commits

Organize code changes into atomic, reviewable work units.

Updated Apr 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LuisAlbertoMK/gentleman-agent-gh --skill work-unit-commits-luisalbertomk
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: work-unit-commits
Source: https://github.com/LuisAlbertoMK/gentleman-agent-gh/tree/main/internal/assets/skills/work-unit-commits
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LuisAlbertoMK/gentleman-agent-gh --skill work-unit-commits-luisalbertomk

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the cognitive load on reviewers and the risk of bloated pull requests by enforcing a disciplined, atomic approach to version control.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Atomic Commit Strategy: Ensures every commit represents a single, deliverable unit of behavior, fix, or documentation.
  • Reviewer-Friendly Workflow: Facilitates the creation of chained or stacked pull requests, keeping individual changes under the 400-line threshold.
  • Use Case: When implementing a complex feature, use this skill to break the work into logical, testable units that allow reviewers to follow the development story commit-by-commit.

Quick Start

Ask the agent to review the current git status and help you group the pending changes into atomic work units that follow the project commit guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions about work-unit-commits

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I group git changes into atomic commits for code review?

To group git changes into atomic commits, you analyze your current git status and organize pending code modifications into single, deliverable units of behavior that adhere to conventional commit standards to ensure each unit is verifiable and reversible.

What is the best way to keep pull requests under 400 lines for version control?

The best way to keep pull requests under 400 lines is to enforce an atomic commit strategy that organizes code changes into reviewable work units, facilitating the creation of chained or stacked pull requests to reduce reviewer cognitive load.

Does atomic commit structuring work with Spec-Driven Development workflows?

Atomic commit structuring integrates directly with Spec-Driven Development workflows to ensure each work unit remains verifiable and reversible during feature development, bug fixing, and refactoring tasks for repository health.

Why should I structure commits as reviewable work units?

You should structure commits as reviewable work units to maintain repository health, simplify pull request management, and reduce the cognitive load on reviewers who need to follow the development story commit-by-commit.

When do I need to use atomic commits in git?

You need atomic commits in git when implementing complex features, fixing bugs, or refactoring tasks where commit granularity is essential for maintainability and requires breaking work into logical, testable units.

Can I use this approach for bug fixes and refactoring tasks?

Yes, this atomic commit strategy applies to bug fixing and refactoring tasks by ensuring every commit represents a single unit of behavior or fix that maintains repository health and simplifies pull request management.