worker-classification

Classifies proposed worker engagements by applying jurisdiction-specific employment tests and flagging misclassification gaps.

Updated Jun 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tk1cntt/PhapChe --skill worker-classification-tk1cntt
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: worker-classification
Source: https://github.com/tk1cntt/PhapChe/tree/main/docs/claude-for-legal-main/employment-legal/skills/worker-classification
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tk1cntt/PhapChe --skill worker-classification-tk1cntt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Companies often label a worker a contractor without testing whether the facts support that label, creating back-pay, payroll-tax, penalty, and benefits exposure. This Skill runs the applicable classification tests on a proposed engagement before work starts and shows exactly where the intended structure conflicts with the facts. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Jurisdiction-specific test application: Researches and applies the operative ABC, economic-realities, common-law, or purpose-specific tests for federal tax, state wage/hour, unemployment, and workers' compensation, with source-tagged citations. - Gap analysis with risk flags: Compares the intended structure (employee, IC, temp, vendor/SOW) against what the facts support, flagging significant risks, weak factors, and clean factors. - Prospective-only safety gate: Blocks retroactive analysis of existing arrangements and routes those to counsel-led remediation instead. - Use Case: A company wants to bring on a data scientist for six months working in its office with company tools; the Skill scores each test factor, concludes the facts lean toward W-2 employment, and recommends restructuring or escalation before the engagement starts. ## Quick Start Describe the proposed working arrangement, including the work, control, economics, structure, and jurisdiction, and ask for a worker classification analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions about worker-classification

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I determine if a worker is an employee or independent contractor?

Apply the classification test operative in the worker's jurisdiction for each legal purpose, such as an ABC test, economic-realities test, or common-law right-to-control test. Score each factor against the actual facts of the engagement, since different purposes like federal tax and state wage/hour can yield different answers.

What is the difference between the ABC test and the economic realities test?

The ABC test is conjunctive, requiring all three prongs to be satisfied for contractor status, while the economic-realities test weighs multiple factors with no single dispositive factor. Which test applies depends on the jurisdiction and the legal purpose, so both must be researched before classifying.

Can this skill analyze a worker who is already engaged?

No, the skill is prospective only and stops if the work has already started. Existing arrangements require a privileged reclassification risk assessment with remediation planning for back pay, payroll taxes, and penalties, which it routes to counsel instead.

When should a worker classification decision be escalated to counsel?

Escalate when the jurisdiction uses a strict test and the work is core to the business, when there is a prior misclassification settlement or audit, when the worker supervises employees, when the engagement exceeds 12 months, or when a contested prong changes the outcome.

Does worker classification differ between federal tax and state wage law?

Yes, different purposes are governed by different tests, and the answers can diverge. A worker may be defensible as a contractor for federal payroll tax while failing a stricter state wage/hour test, so each purpose must be analyzed on its own track.