workflow-code-reviewer

Automate code review feedback by applying a rule-driven protocol to evaluate implemented changes on feature branches or hotfix PRs. The workflow surfaces findings by severity with file references and can auto-apply fixes in an automated reviewer loop.

A structured code review workflow evaluates implemented changes against a repository's documented protocol. It identifies issues, surfaces risks, and documents findings with file references to ensure consistent validation for feature branches and refactoring PRs.

Yes, you can use an automated reviewer loop to validate pull requests. This workflow reviews implemented changes against the repository protocol, surfaces findings by severity, and can auto-apply fixes and push when operating in an automated loop.

Ensure protocol adherence for hotfix PRs by reviewing implemented changes against the repository's documented development workflow. This process surfaces findings by severity with file references and verifies compliance with the review implementation protocol.

Yes, this code review workflow supports automated or manual reviewer workflows, including escalation, tracking, and integration points with existing AGENTS.md guidelines to document findings and validate pull requests.

Rule-driven code review for pull requests is limited by its reliance on the repository's documented review implementation protocol. It strictly evaluates implemented changes against these predefined rules, meaning undocumented edge cases or custom logic may require manual validation.