workflow-discussion-process

Structured software architecture discussions ensure traceability by enforcing YAML frontmatter with name and description, coordinating a live Discussion Map, and applying manifest-driven workflow transitions to capture decisions and rationale.

Documenting design reviews is best handled by merging expert architectural reasoning with automated documentation, using a Documentation Assistant role to record decisions, rationales, and edge cases for future reference across engineering programs.

You can resume architecture research discussions after a context refresh by using stepwise guidance and persistent storage in .workflows metadata, which preserves the Discussion Map and prior decision rationale.

Automated workflow maps drive convergence by orchestrating discussion topics through Phase transitions, allowing an Expert Architect to challenge ideas and surface edge cases until a final decision is reached.

This structured discussion workflow requires no external dependencies, using only internal references to seed the initial Discussion Map, define the work unit, and begin documenting architecture decisions immediately.