workflow-requirements-interview

To extract clear requirements from vague feature requests, use a structured questioning protocol that guides the conversation through scope definition, functional details, and edge case discovery to produce testable specifications.

Documenting acceptance criteria and edge cases for ambiguous projects is best handled by running a phase-driven interview protocol that clarifies undefined success criteria and outputs a formal Requirements.md file.

You interview stakeholders to identify non-functional requirements by applying a structured questioning workflow that progresses from core understanding to scope definition, explicitly capturing NFRs during the dedicated clarification phase.

Yes, you can use a structured requirements interview to resolve conflicting interpretations of a complex feature by systematically questioning multi-interpretation scenarios and documenting the clarified outcomes as formal functional requirements.

Generating a Requirements.md from an undefined project scope involves running a phase-driven interview protocol covering core understanding, functional details, edge case discovery, and documentation to produce formal FRs, NFRs, and open questions.

You should use a structured requirements clarification workflow when facing ambiguous requests, multi-interpretation scenarios, or complex features with undefined success criteria that need conversion into testable documentation.