workflow-review

Coordinate automated checks and reasoning-based reviews to assess code changes against plans.

1|Updated Oct 5, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/simon-downes/agent-workspace --skill workflow-review-simon-downes
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: workflow-review
Source: https://github.com/simon-downes/agent-workspace/tree/main/skills/workflow-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/simon-downes/agent-workspace --skill workflow-review-simon-downes

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Evaluates code changes for quality, standards compliance, and plan alignment, coordinating automated mechanical checks and reasoning-based review to provide a single, coherent assessment before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Milestone review during implementation to verify changes against the Deliverable and plan constraints.
  • Implementation review for full scope, tracing MUST requirements to code and verifying design decisions.
  • Standalone review for ad-hoc PRs or diffs, focusing on code quality and standards without a plan.
  • Plan alignment & scope resolution guidance to determine how changes map to requirements and architecture.

Quick Start

Ask the orchestrator to run a standalone review on the latest feature branch to assess code quality and plan alignment.

Frequently Asked Questions about workflow-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate code review and automated quality checks before merging a pull request?

Milestone review evaluates code changes during implementation by verifying them against deliverable specifications and plan constraints. It traces requirements to code to ensure ongoing feature branches align with architectural design decisions.

Can I run a standalone code review on an ad-hoc feature branch diff without a formal plan?

Standalone review assesses ad-hoc pull requests or diffs by focusing on code quality and standards compliance without requiring a formal plan. It evaluates feature branches independently to identify quality issues before merging.

Does this code review process require integration with linting and formatting tools?

Full implementation review verifies the complete scope by tracing MUST requirements to code and validating design decisions. It ensures the entire implementation satisfies quality standards and aligns with the established plan before final merge.

What is the best way to trace MUST requirements to code during full implementation review?

Implementation review traces MUST requirements to code by resolving plan alignment and scope mapping. It validates design decisions and verifies the full scope of changes against plan constraints and quality standards.