skills.rest
mattdurham
mattdurhamCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

workflow-reviewer

Run a three-pass cross-file code review and generate a consolidated report.

9|3|Updated Feb 8, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#quality#static-analysis#code-review#security-review#cross-file-checks
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mattdurham/bob --skill workflow-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: workflow-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/mattdurham/bob/tree/main/agents/reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mattdurham/bob --skill workflow-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Teams building multi-file software often struggle with catching cross-file inconsistencies, logic gaps, and maintainability issues during code reviews. This skill automates a thorough, multi-pass review workflow to surface semantic errors, API contract mismatches, and quality gaps early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Three-pass review pipeline: cross-file consistency, code quality, and documentation alignment.
  • Consolidated reporting: outputs a single bots/review-code.md with actionable findings.
  • Cross-language applicability: works across languages in large multi-module repos.
  • Real-world use case: run on feature branches to quickly identify logical bugs and maintainability risks before merge.

Quick Start

Spawn the reviewer agent on a codebase to run the three-pass review and generate a detailed report.

Frequently Asked Questions about workflow-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify cross-file inconsistencies during a multi-file code review?▼

Identifying cross-file inconsistencies during a multi-file code review requires a multi-pass workflow that validates logic, security, and maintainability across project files. This approach surfaces API contract mismatches and semantic errors early.

What is a three-pass code review workflow for large multi-module repositories?▼

A three-pass code review workflow systematically evaluates cross-file consistency, code quality, and documentation alignment. It generates a consolidated report with actionable findings to catch logic gaps and maintainability issues in multi-file projects.

How do I automate security reviews and static analysis for feature branches before merge?▼

Automating security reviews and static analysis for feature branches involves running a configurable review pipeline on the codebase. This validates multi-file logic and quality risks, outputting a detailed report before merging.

Does automated cross-file code review work across different programming languages?▼

Automated cross-file code review works across different programming languages in large multi-module repositories. It validates logic, security, and maintainability without being restricted to a single language environment.

What is the best way to consolidate bot reports for code quality and maintainability findings?▼

The best way to consolidate bot reports for code quality is to output a single review-code markdown file. This consolidates context-rich findings from multiple review passes into one actionable document for developers.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
chy5301chy5301

workflow-archive

Summarize completed workflows, archive project files, and clean the workspace.

Community
Intermediate
thbraetthbraet

review-mr

Analyze merge request diffs against main and produce structured review reports.

Community
Advanced
winsorllcwinsorllc

code-review

Execute linters, static analysis, and security scanners on code.

Community
Intermediate
WUIX69WUIX69

coding-standards

Review code for naming, readability, immutability, and maintainability issues.

Community
Intermediate