workflow-routing

Route non-trivial work requests through a formal brief-and-design workflow.

1|Updated Mar 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/davekim917/bootstrap --skill workflow-routing-davekim917
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: workflow-routing
Source: https://github.com/davekim917/bootstrap/tree/main/plugins/workflow/skills/workflow-routing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/davekim917/bootstrap --skill workflow-routing-davekim917

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Non-trivial feature requests, multi-file changes, and ambiguous requirements often lead to misalignment, scope creep, and rework without clear governance. This skill provides a formal routing chain to ensure teams agree on objectives before starting work.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a structured workflow: brief -> design -> review -> plan -> build -> qa -> ship with explicit gates.
  • Requires cross-team coordination for API changes, data-model updates, and subsystem integrations.
  • Provides a governance backbone for high-risk projects and ambiguous requirements.

Quick Start

Start with invoking /team-brief to initiate the formal routing for a non-trivial work item.

Frequently Asked Questions about workflow-routing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce a structured workflow for complex API changes and subsystem integrations?

Enforce a structured workflow by routing non-trivial API changes and subsystem integrations through a formal brief-and-design chain. This requires explicit approvals at each gate to ensure cross-team alignment and project governance before implementation begins.

What is the best way to prevent scope creep when managing ambiguous multi-file edit requests?

Prevent scope creep for ambiguous multi-file edits by applying a formal routing workflow with prerequisites and gates. This approach requires teams to agree on objectives through a structured brief and design review before starting the build phase.

How do I set up cross-team governance gates for high-risk feature requests?

Set up cross-team governance gates by routing high-risk feature requests through a defined sequence: brief, design, review, plan, build, qa, and ship. This enforces explicit approvals and prerequisites at each stage to meet quality standards.

Can I use this workflow routing for data-model changes across multiple teams?

Yes, you can use this workflow routing for data-model changes across multiple teams. It is specifically designed to handle cross-team coordination by enforcing formal briefs, design reviews, and explicit approvals before any data-model updates proceed.

When should I avoid using a formal brief-and-design workflow for project planning?

Avoid using a formal brief-and-design workflow for simple, single-file tasks that do not require cross-team coordination. This governance backbone is intended for non-trivial, high-risk projects where ambiguous requirements and subsystem integrations demand strict gates.