Orchestrate structured design workshops with multiple LLMs and human critique.
npx skills add https://github.com/raine/consult-llm --skill workshop-raine
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: workshop Source: https://github.com/raine/consult-llm/tree/main/skills/workshop Command: npx skills add https://github.com/raine/consult-llm --skill workshop-raine
Interactive design sessions are hard to orchestrate; this skill guides a human through clarifying dialogue and coordinates multiple LLMs to generate divergent approaches, then co-designs the chosen path with optional multi-LLM critique before saving.
Load the workshop skill and start a guided design session that crowdsources divergent approaches from multiple LLMs, lets the user pick one, and then co-designs the chosen plan with optional multi-LLM critique before saving.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To facilitate a multi-LLM design workshop, this skill orchestrates a structured session where multiple models generate distinct approaches in parallel for you to compare. It guides you through goal clarification, approach selection, and co-design before saving.
Yes, you can use this structured design workflow for architectural reviews and product debates. It supports human-in-the-loop critique sessions by fanning out independent expert prompts to multiple LLMs and aggregating their responses.
The best way to run a co-design critique session is using this skill's phased exploration workflow. It dispatches divergent design proposals to multiple LLMs, lets you select a path, and applies an optional multi-LLM critique phase before persisting results.
Yes, you need the consult-llm framework to orchestrate multi-model design sessions. This skill relies on consult-llm as the invocation contract to dispatch and aggregate responses from multiple LLMs during the design workshop.
This tool aggregates multiple LLM responses by relying on the consult-llm framework's invocation contract to dispatch parallel prompts and collect divergent approaches. You then clarify goals and select an approach for co-design.
A limitation of using multi-LLM voices for interactive design sessions is that the workflow requires human-in-the-loop critique to evaluate divergent approaches and select a path. The LLMs propose plans, but a human must drive the co-design and finalization.
raineCoordinate alternating-turn brainstorming between two LLMs to synthesize a collaborative plan.
danzam98Synthesize competing LLM outputs into a unified hybrid plan with traceable revisions.
afterworkRun multi-iteration reflex loops with PLAN, PRODUCE, EVALUATE, CRITIQUE, and REFINE phases.
tann200Analyzes user requests and composes structured design briefs for generating distinct hypotheses via a design subagent.
