write-component

Markdown stub expansion validates and injects required sections while preserving headings and theory links, replacing TODO placeholders with concrete content to produce a publish-ready reference page.

Generating consistent content pages from a style guide requires validating inputs against formatting rules and injecting mandatory sections. This ensures the final documentation maintains structure-compliant formatting suitable for content management workflows.

The best way to turn a stub into a complete component page is to automate the extraction of existing headings and inject frontmatter-driven sections. This approach maintains the original document order while replacing placeholders with bench-oriented content.

Yes, you can preserve existing headings when expanding a Markdown stub. The process extracts and maintains the original order of all heading lines and theory links, ensuring the expanded document retains the stub's initial structure and references.

Stub automation works without external dependencies, relying entirely on the project style guide and the stub file itself. It validates inputs internally and applies frontmatter-driven guidance to maintain formatting compliance throughout the content generation process.

Validating required sections in component documentation involves checking the stub against a frontmatter-driven workflow that mandates five specific sections. It references the project style guide to ensure formatting compliance and injects any missing structure automatically.