writing

Review and polish academic manuscripts in LaTeX, Markdown, Quarto, or plain text.

8|2|Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/FuZhiyu/superRA --skill writing-fuzhiyu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: writing
Source: https://github.com/FuZhiyu/superRA/tree/main/skills/writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/FuZhiyu/superRA --skill writing-fuzhiyu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps researchers improve academic manuscripts without silently changing their argument, evidence, technical claims, structure, or authorial intent.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review: Identify issues in prose, structure, citations, consistency, argument logic, and paper-code alignment.
  • Polish: Proofread and refine existing LaTeX, Markdown, Quarto, or plain-text writing while preserving substance and applying minimal edits.
  • Draft: Create new academic prose from notes, outlines, tables, and surrounding sections using audience-aware structure and style checks.
  • Use Case: Apply the Skill to review a full research paper, polish a methods section, check citation consistency, or draft a results section from analysis outputs.

Quick Start

Use the writing skill to review the attached manuscript for clarity, structure, citation completeness, and consistency while preserving its substantive claims.

Frequently Asked Questions about writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I proofread a LaTeX manuscript without changing the technical claims?

Academic manuscript proofreading applies minimal edits to LaTeX, Markdown, or plain text while preserving the author's argument, evidence, and technical claims. The process refines prose clarity and structure without altering substantive content or authorial intent.

What is citation consistency checking for research papers?

Citation consistency checking audits academic manuscripts to identify mismatched references, incomplete citations, and structural gaps. It reviews bibliography entries against in-text citations to ensure compliance with project conventions and publication-ready formatting.

Can I draft a results section from analysis outputs and tables?

Drafting academic prose from notes, outlines, and tables creates new sections using audience-aware structure and style checks. The process generates results or methods sections that align with surrounding document sections and target audience expectations.

Does the manuscript review process check paper-code alignment and argument logic?

Manuscript review identifies issues in prose, structure, citations, consistency, argument logic, and paper-code alignment. It evaluates the full research paper to ensure technical claims match supporting code evidence and logical flow remains intact.

What are the limitations of automated academic writing and polishing?

Automated academic polishing applies minimal edits and requires mode-specific workflows, audience modeling, and project-convention alignment. It preserves substantive claims but cannot generate novel research hypotheses or validate the scientific accuracy of technical evidence.